Ad Code

Feasibility Reports Typical writing situation the questions readers ask most often superstructure for feasibility reports



Typical Writing Situation:

All feasibility reports share one essential characteristic i.e. they are written to help decision[1]makers to choose between two or more courses of action. Even when a feasibility report seems to focus primarily on one course of action, the readers are always considering a second course: to leave things the way they are. An example of leaving things the way they are, is to continue to use metal parts rather than plastic parts in the sailboats. In many situations, however, readers will already have decided that some change is necessary and will be choosing between two or more alternatives to the status quo.

The Questions Readers Ask Most Often: As they think about the choice they must make, decision-makers ask many questions. From situation to situation, these basic questions remain the same. That’s why it becomes possible for one to use the similar superstructure of feasibility report for variety of situations. Decision makers ask questions such as:

Why is it important for us to consider these alternatives?

b. Are your criteria reasonable and appropriate?

 c. Are your facts reliable?

 d. What are the important features of the alternatives?

e. How do the alternatives stack up against your criteria?

f. What conclusions do you draw about the alternatives?

 g. What do you think we should do?

a. Why is it important for us to consider these alternatives?

Decision-makers ask this question because they want to know why they have to make any choice in the first place. Your readers may need a detailed explanation of a problem to realize the importance of considering alternative courses of action. On the other hand, if the readers are familiar with the problem, they may see the importance of considering the alternatives, if you simply remind them of the situation.

b. Are your criteria reasonable and appropriate?

To help your readers choose between the alternative courses of action, you must evaluate the alternatives in terms of specific criteria. At work, people want these criteria to reflect the needs and aims of their organization.

c. Are your facts reliable?

Decision-makers want to be sure that your facts are reliable before they take any action, based on those facts.

d. What are the important features of the alternatives?

Readers want you to present an overview that highlights the key features of each alternative. So that, they can understand your detailed discussion of the alternatives

e. How do the alternatives stack up against your criteria?

The heart of a feasibility study is your evaluation of the alternatives in terms of your criteria. Your readers want to know the results.

f. What conclusions do you draw about the alternatives?

Based upon your detailed evaluation of the alternatives, you will reach some general conclusion about the merits of each alternative. Decision-makers need to know your conclusions because these overall judgments form the basis for decision-making.

g. What do you think we should do?

 In the end, your readers must choose one of the alternative courses of action. Because of your expertise on the subject, they want you to help them by telling, what you recommend.

Follow Our Channels:

 

Post a Comment

1 Comments

Please do not enter any spam link in the comment box.

Close Menu